19 Mar

The Natural Roots of Sexuality

Current studies in animal sexuality serve to dispel two common myths: that sex is exclusively about reproduction and that homosexuality is an unnatural sexual preference. It now appears that sex is also about entertainment as it frequently happens out of the mating season. And same-sex copulation and bonding prevail in numerous species, from bonobo apes to gulls.

{Moreover, homosexual couples in the Animal Kingdom are prone to habits typically – and incorrectly – associated only to heterosexuals.|Homosexual couples in the Animal Kingdom are prone to habits typically – and incorrectly – associated only to heterosexuals.} The New York Times reported in its February 7, 2004 issue about a few gay penguins who are frantically and regularly seeking to incubate eggs together.

In the very same post (” Love that Dare not Squeak its Name”), Bruce Bagemihl, author of the groundbreaking “Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity”, specifies homosexuality as “any of these habits between members of the very same sex: long-term bonding, sexual contact, courtship screens or the rearing of young.”

{Still, that a particular habits happens in nature (is “natural”) does not render it moral. Infanticide, patricide, suicide, gender predisposition, and substance abuse – are all to be found in different animal species. It is futile to argue for homosexuality or versus it based on zoological observations. Ethics has to do with exceeding nature – not about imitating it.|Still, that a particular habits happens in nature (is “natural”) does not render it moral. It is futile to argue for homosexuality or versus it based on zoological observations.}

The more perplexing question stays: exactly what are the biological and evolutionary advantages of leisure sex and homosexuality? Definitely, both involve the waste of limited resources.

Convoluted descriptions, such as the one proffered by Marlene Zuk (homosexuals contribute to the gene pool by nurturing and raising young loved ones) defy good sense, experience, and the calculus of advancement. There are no field studies that reveal conclusively and even show that homosexuals have the tendency to raise and nurture their younger loved ones more that straights do.

{Moreover, the math of genetics would rule out such a stratagem.|The math of genetics would rule out such a stratagem.} If the aim of life is to hand down one’s genes from one generation to the next, the homosexual would have been far much better off raising his own children (who carry forward half his DNA) – instead of his nephew or niece (with whom he shares merely one quarter of his genetic material.).

Exactly what is more, though genetically-predisposed, homosexuality may be partially acquired, the result of environment and nurture, instead of nature.

An oft-overlooked truth is that leisure sex and homosexuality have one thing in common: they do not cause reproduction. Homosexuality may, therefore, be a kind of pleasurable sexual play. It may also enhance same-sex bonding and train the young to form cohesive, purposeful groups (the army and the boarding school entered your mind).

{{In addition, homosexuality amounts to the culling of 10-15% of the gene pool in each generation.|Homosexuality amounts to the culling of 10-15% of the gene pool in each generation.} The genetic material of the homosexual is not propagated and is efficiently omitted from the big live roulette of life. Growers – of anything from cereals to livestock – likewise utilize random culling to improve their stock. As mathematical models reveal, such duplicated mass removal of DNA from the common brew appears to optimize the species and increase its strength and efficiency.|Homosexuality amounts to the culling of 10-15% of the gene pool in each generation. As mathematical models reveal, such duplicated mass removal of DNA from the common brew appears to optimize the species and increase its strength and efficiency.}

{It is paradoxical to recognize that homosexuality and other types of non-reproductive, pleasure-seeking sex may be key evolutionary mechanisms and integral drivers of population characteristics. Reproduction is however one goal amongst lots of, equally crucial, end results. Heterosexuality is however one method amongst a couple of optimal solutions. Studying biology may yet cause higher tolerance for the large repertory of human sexual foibles, preferences, and preferences. Back to nature, in this case, may be forward to civilization.|It is paradoxical to recognize that homosexuality and other types of non-reproductive, pleasure-seeking sex may be key evolutionary mechanisms and integral drivers of population characteristics. Reproduction is however one goal amongst lots of, equally crucial, end outcomes.}

Suggested Literature.

Bagemihl, Bruce – “Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity” – St. Martin’s Press, 1999.

De-Waal, Frans and Lanting, Frans – “Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape” – University of California Press, 1997.

De Waal, Frans – “Bonobo Sex and Society” – March 1995 issue of Scientific American, pp. 82-88.

Trivers, Robert – Natural Selection and Social Theory: Selected Papers – Oxford University Press, 2002.

Zuk, Marlene – “Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can’t Learn About Sex From Animals” – University of California Press, 2002.

Current studies in animal sexuality serve to dispel two common myths: that sex is exclusively about reproduction and that homosexuality is an unnatural sexual preference. An oft-overlooked truth is that leisure sex and homosexuality have one thing in common: they do not lead to reproduction. Homosexuality may, therefore, be a kind of pleasurable sexual play. Homosexuality amounts to the culling of 10-15% of the gene pool in each generation. It is paradoxical to recognize that homosexuality and other types of non-reproductive, pleasure-seeking sex may be key evolutionary mechanisms and integral drivers of population characteristics.

for more info [dcl=4723]

Click the website of

Leave a Reply